From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,546c9d71cfb0c1ee X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-03-14 10:12:41 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!bloom-beacon.mit.edu!news-out.cwix.com!newsfeed.cwix.com!border1.nntp.ash.giganews.com!border2.nntp.ash.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!in.100proofnews.com!in.100proofnews.com!tiscali!newsfeed1.ip.tiscali.net!news.worldonline.be!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [Announcement] New Project: ASIS for GNAT Date: 14 Mar 2004 19:16:09 +0100 Organization: Worldonline Belgium Sender: lbrenta@deuteronomy Message-ID: <87brmzs39y.fsf@insalien.org> References: <1252369.os30E2mMWi@linux1.krischik.com> <3zl4c.17228$mM.123491@attbi_s02> <46b8b50a.0403140746.95e9c51@posting.google.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: ppp-62-235-77-194.tiscali.be Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.worldonline.be 1079287955 17499 62.235.77.194 (14 Mar 2004 18:12:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: abuse@worldonline.be NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2004 18:12:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:6322 Date: 2004-03-14T19:16:09+01:00 List-Id: rolf.ebert_nospam_@gmx.net (Rolf Ebert) writes: > I ran gcc 3.3.3 and 3.4 prereleases on the ACATS test suite at several > optimization levels on Linux and Windows during the last few weeks. > As I cannot attach a pdf or Excel file here, I am willing to send the > summary sheet to anybody who is interested. > > In short: the 3.4 prereleases are considerably better than the 3.3.3 > release. The number of failures dropped from 24 to 7 (Linux) or 5 > (Windows) out of more than 2300 test files. The remaining 7 errors on > Linux are all related to the complex calculation library and don't > show up on Windows. The number of failures is stable at -O0 to -O2. > Only further optimizations and inlining (-O3, -gnatN, > -funroll-all-loop, -finline-functions) trigger additional failures. Thank you for these data points. It has been my experience with 3.15p that -gnatVa tends to trigger ICE's quite often. As I find the additional checks valuable, I would suggest that running the ACATS tests with -gnatVa (and possibly -gnatwa, too) might be worthwhile. -- Ludovic Brenta.