From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,735c710b5e547bad
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.224.180.205 with SMTP id bv13mr1429124qab.8.1343315796974;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:16:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.88.5 with SMTP id bc5mr1806291pab.11.1343315705635;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:15:05 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 a15ni113198934qag.0!nntp.google.com!q21no4638185qas.0!news-out.google.com!p10ni65010571pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!novia!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!ramfeed-2.ams.xsnews.nl!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.antakira.com!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Ada 2005 puzzle
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 12:08:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87boj8az0z.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <1arp60wtxes8h$.1qs6bt732ztgp.dlg@40tude.net>
	<030cde76-7435-405d-9f12-ac7f730ecab8@googlegroups.com>
	<1f9q6vk5z2r3t$.1hayo9rmxfwu7$.dlg@40tude.net>
	<ju8atj$734$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<7308644e-bfbe-44c1-8359-d67392d483e1@googlegroups.com>
	<juaghb$fv9$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<72bc2c23-4a1c-4c09-985e-8cc4c0fd957f@googlegroups.com>
	<1uli63mb1e82x.11cuz41guddr5.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1342951723 14723 172.17.135.6 (22 Jul 2012 10:08:43 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pyn5HRgI0o967i4iiAW5NYFtceM=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-07-22T12:08:44+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Dmitry A. Kazakov:

> The problem is that a *new* limited object cannot be result of a function,
> this is conceptually broken.

The compiler can rewrite the function and its call, passing the new
object to a continuation, so it's not really impossible to implement.