From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Bob Duff <bobduff@theworld.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: New to Ada, why these warning messages?
Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2016 16:18:00 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87bn95yp6f.fsf@theworld.com>
References: <n64nnt$ft6$1@reader1.panix.com> <n6545n$cnt$2@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="81112f14cab07c2d3027322ae68a65fb";
	logging-data="24243"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/2n4qeeIQfYgPGJxbhfT+V"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:wXtiaYlCdBzR9AdJla824L4xtxc=
	sha1:E1X5Q0nDO71iJlArtJTjzygLUqg=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:28972
Date: 2016-01-01T16:18:00-05:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Jeffrey R. Carter" <spam.jrcarter.not@spam.not.acm.org> writes:

> This would be better written
>
>    (Atype'range => Blue)
>
> or
>
>    (Paint => Blue)

Even better:

    C := (others => Blue);

>>    -- Print out the contents of each of A, B, and C.
>>    for I in 1..N loop
>
>    for I in A'range loop
>
>>       Put(PNames(A(I)) & " ");

In Ada 2012 you can say:

    for X of A loop
        Put(PNames(X) & " ");

That's better, because it leaves out the extraneous object I,
which has nothing to do with the problem being solved.

- Bob