From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,ea8ea502d35ca2ce X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-05-06 06:02:40 PST Path: newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!151.189.0.75!newsfeed.germany.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Beginner's Language? Date: 06 May 2001 15:14:18 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <87ae4q4o2d.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <9cukad$nn68@news-dxb> <9d0fr2$9281@news.cis.okstate.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: newsfeed.google.com comp.lang.ada:7232 Date: 2001-05-06T15:14:18+02:00 List-Id: dvdeug@x8b4e53cd.dhcp.okstate.edu (David Starner) writes: > Why a functional language? I would think a procedural language would > be easier to teach as a first language, and would provide them with > framework needed for the languages most programmings being done it. If someone has reasonable basic mathematical training (in particular, if s/he knows how to play around with sets and mappings), you can explain the basics of functional programming in those terms. I think this much easier to understand than the concept of a stateful machine executing some program code.