From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,5ff6e0c3de8331c0
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder3.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: sub-optimal code for packed boolean arrays -- bug or inherent
 limitation
References: <1183404856.375083.160890@q69g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>
Date: Mon, 02 Jul 2007 22:08:46 +0200
Message-ID: <87abuek1pt.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X9WYOnt6sSJ5/jPSJRmj6WFRjOo=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Organization: Tele2
X-Trace: 
 DXC=Eah0IWTG8JolN]RWbE^<Ok6`Y6aWje^Yj8DkR@G7HBBhm@[o=d]MiOm9C:6=hX_T6ejiik`2P`e?h
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16388
Date: 2007-07-02T22:08:46+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Alinabi <alexander.the.average@gmail.com> writes:
> Hello, everyone.

Unfortunately I don't know enough of GCC's optimisers to answer.  I
think you should ask your (interesting) question on the GCC mailing
list, where not only the GNAT developers but the optimiser developers
dwell.  The list is gcc@gcc.gnu.org.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.