From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,a32653cf595422e6
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.68.233.170 with SMTP id tx10mr9088505pbc.0.1335116346697;
        Sun, 22 Apr 2012 10:39:06 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 r9ni86257pbh.0!nntp.google.com!news2.google.com!news.glorb.com!feeder.erje.net!nuzba.szn.dk!news.jacob-sparre.dk!munin.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: GNAT and register allocation
Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 19:39:04 +0200
Organization: Jacob Sparre Andersen Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <87aa23d5tz.fsf@adaheads.sparre-andersen.dk>
References: <4f9138c2$0$6628$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
	<4f9145b5$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<jmrpej$cao$1@speranza.aioe.org>
	<4f918218$0$6557$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net>
	<82r4vhi8v4.fsf@stephe-leake.org>
	<4f94352f$0$6625$9b4e6d93@newsspool2.arcor-online.net>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 212.27.23.251.bredband.3.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: munin.nbi.dk 1335116345 22858 212.27.23.251 (22 Apr 2012 17:39:05
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 22 Apr 2012 17:39:05 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:FQCmSvADuLZIDmzWQaXnD9cT9Yk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-04-22T19:39:04+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Georg Bauhaus wrote:

>>> I must use one set of options for an entire program in this case.

> This requirement is likely a fact (external) that we can't change.

But aren't you adhering to the requirement, if you execute "gnatmake -P
some_project_file" to build the entire program?  Or is it mandated that
each child process of "gnatmake" should have the same build options?

Do you know (and are you free to tell us) the rationale for the
requirement?

Greetings,

Jacob
-- 
recursive, adj.; see recursive