From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!gandalf.srv.welterde.de!news.jacob-sparre.dk!loke.jacob-sparre.dk!pnx.dk!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Jacob Sparre Andersen <sparre@nbi.dk>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Pretty-printer?  (Alternatives to "gnatpp")
Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 19:07:32 +0100
Organization: JSA Research & Innovation
Message-ID: <87a8m2jlp7.fsf@adaheads.consafe1.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 109.57.205.199.mobile.3.dk
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: loke.gir.dk 1457892453 9801 109.57.205.199 (13 Mar 2016 18:07:33 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@jacob-sparre.dk
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Mar 2016 18:07:33 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:KGxWaAu9R+hf/+7kCMZw5nlHM8A=
Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:29734
Date: 2016-03-13T19:07:32+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

What pretty-printers are available for Ada (83-2012)?

I'm already aware of "gnatpp", but it has two disadvantages:

 1) You have to have set up the environment to compile the source file,
    before you can pretty-print it.

 2) You can't get it to select the casing of identifiers on a
    word-by-word basis (which means that I have to repeat every acronym
    we use in the project once for every identifier it occurs in).

What alternatives are there?

How do they fare compared to "gnatpp"?

Greetings,

Jacob
-- 
Ada - the programming language still ahead of its time.