From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00
	autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
Path: 
 eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: some trivial questions?
Date: Wed, 22 Nov 2017 17:11:31 -0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <87a7zder3w.fsf@nightsong.com>
References: <6a5368c5-f015-4dcb-9291-e77b40fa1bf1@googlegroups.com>
	<ff607ea1-9d64-441b-b5e6-1a4377a5a199@googlegroups.com>
	<oteku0$ek3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <oulbpm$p2t$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<oum6qv$1bdr$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ouo1hg$fjr$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<ouotuh$1ig3$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ouvjfp$8rd$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<ov0v0f$663$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ov2hvr$i7m$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
	<ov3dah$rb$1@gioia.aioe.org> <ov5479$eg9$1@franka.jacob-sparre.dk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="9a4a1f1723a50708912fa7affa5f76ea";
	logging-data="29753"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+kDksnEY3BiadzbDtxGKgc"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:03iIXg0tDRy1AlW/n5VyeBkmcuM=
	sha1:QUzSLw5fOKCONgD89vRVcxycCg0=
Xref: feeder.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:49086
Date: 2017-11-22T17:11:31-08:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"Randy Brukardt" <randy@rrsoftware.com> writes:
> I agree with your points, but how do you prove compatibility of whatever 
> model is adopted? Given that Ada is currently defined with English wording, 

Is that really a big problem?  I know Ada shops like Praxis have been
writing specifications in Z-notation for ages, while being able to get
customers understanding what the specs mean.