From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,c1b1b81e16e83802 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2003-07-01 02:17:56 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!newsfeed.freenet.de!feed.news.nacamar.de!news.belwue.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Help-memory allocation Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2003 11:17:56 +0200 Organization: InterNetNews at News.BelWue.DE (Stuttgart, Germany) Message-ID: <878yriobaz.fsf@Login.CERT.Uni-Stuttgart.DE> References: <87y8zjvckv.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: login.cert.uni-stuttgart.de Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: news.BelWue.DE 1057051076 28144 129.69.16.19 (1 Jul 2003 09:17:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@news.belwue.de NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 1 Jul 2003 09:17:56 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.090008 (Oort Gnus v0.08) Emacs/21.3 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Cancel-Lock: sha1:9EF+wMfO48EE2ahD5D/wXFeLp5g= Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:39951 Date: 2003-07-01T11:17:56+02:00 List-Id: vashwath@rediffmail.com (prashna) writes: > Don't you think "commit on allocate" is better choice? At least on UNIX systems with a few typical UNIX services, the situations in which the system continues to run in commit-on-use mode is a proper subset of the situations for commit-on-allocate mode. So commit-on-use is the better choice.