From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d0f6c37e3c1b712a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!border2.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 15:33:32 -0500 From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: AdaCore ... the Next SCO? References: <1151405920.523542.137920@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com> <1151434144.2179.36.camel@localhost> <1151965334.709372.227600@a14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <3Ryqg.368$Rk2.140@trndny04> <1152882713.304794.267470@i42g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <34r70ox8kc.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <1153167224.590828.32290@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> <1153175027.628030.98470@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com> <1153220326.967685.309610@m73g2000cwd.googlegroups.com> Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 22:33:56 +0200 Message-ID: <878xmqy7nv.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:iDWJMrHD2FOKH19AyQTxdMcdaRM= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.233.126 X-Trace: sv3-h4e6mWN9eND4DQZ9X4VmERBHFVu2xG3jh8yUxOD6CsGA2oCb6uUshg/cibEzeL8WR2VZDIlThOxflX9!VGUnNUiWIt9QJtdz/HxUBeOopaF4d1oRGAtp2hhDx9RDosEEKfJOsJpe54tXg/uubdnftM66AK0= X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5786 Date: 2006-07-18T22:33:56+02:00 List-Id: Michael Bode writes: > Marius Amado-Alves writes: > >>> It would be much cleaner if they would simply put out a new version of >>> their libs with the headers cleaned up to what they want the license >>> to be. >> >> Isn't that what they did? > > Maybe in some places and not in others (GtkAda). Not in their CVS server, in fact, but in all the software they ship as part of GPL Editions, AFAICT. -- Ludovic Brenta.