From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,2cb1f0b6d642e1dc
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news-2.dfn.de!news.dfn.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Pascal Calling Convention
Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2011 18:38:53 +0200
Message-ID: <878vw0msbm.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <9b04626e-567d-408c-aab3-39b964b3ffd6@l2g2000prg.googlegroups.com>
	<op.vstkpc1rule2fv@index.ici> <ime30d$rrk$1@munin.nbi.dk>
	<op.vstobjtxule2fv@index.ici>
	<F8mdnYCca6tRJBfQnZ2dnUVZ_s-dnZ2d@earthlink.com>
	<lnipv89vg7.fsf@nuthaus.mib.org> <87y641vabt.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<wccipv4h703.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: ruchba.enyo.de 1301243933 10972 172.17.135.6 (27 Mar 2011 16:38:53
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:pNQMGE8gzaopVFINlHHuLoAKwp0=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:18498
Date: 2011-03-27T18:38:53+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Robert A. Duff:

> Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de> writes:
>
>> But there is undefined behavior because the standard says so, and
>> undefined behavior because it's not specified at all (perhaps
>> accidentally).  "Erroneous execution" doesn't suffer from this
>> problem.
>
> I don't see the difference.  How do you know I didn't leave out
> something important when I wrote some part of the Ada RM?
> Of course, I tried not to, and I'm sure people writing the C
> standard did, too.

It's just when I say something is "undefined", it's not clear in what
category it is.  That's why I think the label is confusing.