From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,4a1981ab38038a0b
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-01-05 05:53:49 PST
Path: 
 supernews.google.com!sn-xit-02!supernews.com!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Access in parameters
Date: 05 Jan 2001 14:42:44 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <877l4acdyj.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <934cbk$9ta$1@nnrp1.deja.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:3681
Date: 2001-01-05T14:42:44+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Sandro Binetti <sandrobinetti@my-deja.com> writes:

>   type T_XXX is access all integer;
> 
>   procedure PP(x:in t_xxx) is
>   begin
>     x.all:=10; -- ????
>   end pp;
> 
> Can an in-access-parameter be modified inside a procedure?

In this case, you don't modify the parameter x, but the object given
x.all.