From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,a644fa9cd1a3869a X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-10 09:21:15 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsmi-us.news.garr.it!newsmi-eu.news.garr.it!NewsITBone-GARR!elvis.franken.de!chico.franken.de!uni-erlangen.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: List container strawman 1.2 Date: Sat, 10 Nov 2001 18:43:58 +0100 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <877ksyfrmp.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <3BECA3B7.5020702@telepath.com> <9sjf4n$odm$1@news.huji.ac.il> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cancel-Lock: sha1:de1ex2hXG9vAIDhEZMJeuYFVGfU= Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16227 Date: 2001-11-10T18:43:58+01:00 List-Id: "Ehud Lamm" writes: > If I am seeing correctly we are still stuck with the library level > instantiation bussiness. I must say that it seems to me that I'd > rather ditch the Controlled type, and remove this obstacle. I agree completely. The controlled type is not such a big win for this kind of design, it seems.