From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,9d929352a358ccab X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news1.google.com!proxad.net!proxad.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada to C++ translator Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:08:16 +0100 Message-ID: <877j8oow1r.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <1138132539.577082.206380@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com> <87zmlkoz4k.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1138223296 27587 212.9.189.177 (25 Jan 2006 21:08:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:jBY3Y0TUMNarzsmpPlgnHpj9bHs= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:2633 Date: 2006-01-25T22:08:16+01:00 List-Id: * Martin Dowie: >> Implicit instantiation of templates, for example. Low-overhead >> destructors, parameterized exceptions and multiple inheritance come to >> my mind, too. And there is wild pointer arithmetic, of course. > > What's "high-overhead" about Ada finalization? It's an abort-deferred operation (like assignment, which I should have mentioned as well).