From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!newsfeed0.kamp.net!newsfeed.kamp.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Heartbleed Date: Sat, 12 Apr 2014 21:18:08 +0200 Organization: Informatimago Message-ID: <877g6u4arz.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> References: <1ljwj8f.1wqbhvuabsdw1N%csampson@inetworld.net> <51c7d6d4-e3be-44d5-a4ce-f7e875345588@googlegroups.com> <%J32v.70539$kp1.45343@fx14.iad> <87mwfq4vvj.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> <87eh124awq.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: individual.net NAfBDHaX5QUsv+FjH+Cg/wgKc6C/bQvINfyj+nsOBfrrHBqraI Cancel-Lock: sha1:MmNjMTNlZDAzNzAyZWVjNjE5ZjZkNjA3YzJlNmZmMTQ2M2UwYjZmZA== sha1:rQZ5cfZXcbgDHQqTeJcQLvZVsCc= Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Accept-Language: fr, es, en User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:19277 Date: 2014-04-12T21:18:08+02:00 List-Id: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" writes: > There will always be bugs remaining, even in tested and more > importantly, even in proven software! Cf. for example, the Deep Space 1 > RAX software, written in Lisp, and proven! Despite the proof, a bug > remained. If it had been a statically checked programming language, it > would have meant a terminal dead-lock or a crash (what else to do with a > static language when we reach a state that has been proved impossible?). > But since it was a dynamic programming language, (with very late > binding, including a on-board compiler), it was debugged and patched > remotely, as a last ressort solution. Reference: Formal Analysis of the Remote Agent Before and After Flight http://spinroot.com/spin/Doc/rax.pdf -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ "Le mercure monte ? C'est le moment d'acheter !"