From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID,
	LOTS_OF_MONEY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,c5052684d3523ff1
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk)
Subject: Re: GNAT 3.07 MsDos/DJGPP bug report to whom?
Date: 1997/10/25
Message-ID: <877754304.65snx@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 284826737
References: <dewar.877638631@merv>
Distribution: world
Organization: *JerryWare HQ*, Leiden, Holland
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-10-25T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <dewar.877638631@merv> dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu writes:

>I must say that my experience
>is that although these uncited "printed reports" saying that a majority
>of corporate PC's are running Windows 3.1 may have been right 12 months
>ago, these days, most corporate environments I interact with are running
>either NT or Win95.

Experiences differ.

The 10 largest financial global corporations over here are for 90%
still at 3.11. Reason: a reasonably sized corporation would have to
invest a couple of hundred million dollar in the upgrade to Win95,
without a matching functionality or productivity gain.

--

-- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland
-- Consultant     | Team Ada
-- Ordina Finance | jdijk@acm.org