From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,349657f8b72f2411
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Chris Morgan <mihalis@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Where's Ada95 when OO languages are discussed?
Date: 1999/03/25
Message-ID: <87677pxlcd.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 459119073
Sender: cm@mihalis.ix.netcom.com
References: <7d8ik6$s6d$1@its.hooked.net>
 <36faa349.61093447@news.mindspring.com>
Organization: Linux Hackers Unlimited
X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Mar 25  4:20:28 PM CST 1999
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1999-03-25T16:20:28-06:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

munck@Mill-Creek-Systems.com (Bob Munck) writes:

> I think that we all should thank Chris Morgan for showing us
> at length and in gory detail how NOT to respond to the
> expression of opinions about Ada and its relationship
> to other languages.  It was excruciatingly embarrassing.

Very sorry about that. Go ahead and show us all how it should be done.