From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,349657f8b72f2411 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Chris Morgan Subject: Re: Where's Ada95 when OO languages are discussed? Date: 1999/03/28 Message-ID: <87677myqyc.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 459940252 Sender: cm@mihalis.ix.netcom.com References: <7d8ik6$s6d$1@its.hooked.net> <36F7F02E.BC57F7CB@aasaa.ofe.org> <87emmfpw3t.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <36F837D3.3F7227FA@aasaa.ofe.org> <877ls7porm.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> <36F861A0.62887698@aasaa.ofe.org> <874snbpfzp.fsf@mihalis.ix.netcom.com> Organization: Linux Hackers Unlimited X-NETCOM-Date: Sun Mar 28 12:10:48 AM PST 1999 Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-03-28T00:10:48-08:00 List-Id: Keith Thompson writes: > > Oh? Is there something about Java that prevents compiling it to > machine code? Firstly it supports dynamic class loading and requires run-time verification. Secondly every function call is virtual. The latter is a cheap shot, true, but since my posts are "excruciatingly embarrassing" what's the difference. -- Chris Morgan