From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,33ec2881cc3ecf36 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: ada < - > java bindings wanted Date: 1999/08/20 Message-ID: <87672a8b5u.fsf@deneb.cygnus.qad.org>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 515263986 References: <37BD0169.B49F73A5@acenet.com.au> <7pjm8u$on1$1@nnrp1.deja.com> <7pjovd$qo8$1@nnrp1.deja.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: fw@s.netic.de X-Trace: deneb.cygnus.qad.org 935179901 26229 192.168.1.2 (20 Aug 1999 20:11:41 GMT) Organization: Penguin on board Mime-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) Emacs/20.4 NNTP-Posting-Date: 20 Aug 1999 20:11:41 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-08-20T20:11:41+00:00 List-Id: Ted Dennison writes: > According to http://www.opensource.org/certification-mark.html, that's > not quite true. "OpenSource" could not be trademarked, so the > certification mark is "OSI Certified". > > Does the GMG enjoy this status? If `GMG' means GPL plus exceptions for compiling and linking with library code, the answer is probably yes: Depending on the use of the library code, there aren't any restrictions at all -- or the GPL applies, which is OSI certified. > I don't think meerly reading the OpenSource definition ( > http://www.opensource.org/osd.html ) is enough, as to my mind clause 9 > disqualifies the GPL, yet it is listed as being approved ( > http://www.opensource.org/certification-mark.html#approved-licenses ). You can ship GPL software along with non-GPL software. IMHO that's what clause 9 is all about.