From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Thread: 109fba,582dff0b3f065a52
X-Google-Attributes: gid109fba,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-08-09 13:29:02 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!151.189.0.75!newsfeed.germany.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: How Ada could have prevented the Red Code distributed denial of
 service attack.
Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 22:26:33 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <8766bxx9mu.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <bebbba07.0107292308.d1192fc@posting.google.com>
 <tmfvrpmb575l80@corp.supernews.com>
 <5ee5b646.0108010949.5abab7fe@posting.google.com>
 <%CX97.14134$ar1.47393@www.newsranger.com>
 <L5Y97.14163$ar1.47661@www.newsranger.com>
 <tmgrs9anc69q95@corp.supernews.com>
 <dale-8EE262.08123502082001@mec2.bigpond.net.au>
 <Xz%97.2632$B37.106689@news1.rdc1.bc.home.com>
 <9ka1jc$mgd@augusta.math.psu.edu>
 <3b690498.1111845720@news.worldonline.nl>
 <9kbu15$9bj@augusta.math.psu.edu>
 <made-on-a-macintosh-969204-20460@usenet.l1t.lt>
 <9kbvsr$a02@augusta.math.psu.edu> <3B69DB35.4412459E@home.com>
 <q22nk9.r1p.ln@10.0.0.2> <JzUb7.1653$NJ6.5860@www.newsranger.com>
 <9kp9n7$ivm$1@nh.pace.co.uk> <apesk9.env.ln@10.0.0.2>
 <sYwc7.3920$NJ6.15560@www.newsranger.com>
 <1exve0j.1lboe8gneysd0N%clarkcox3@yahoo.com>
 <wdzc7.4066$NJ6.17172@www.newsranger.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11707 comp.lang.c++:81335
Date: 2001-08-09T22:26:33+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com> writes:

G>>    It can be, but it can also be an inline function, or a simple
>>call-through to the built in operator++, in both cases, any compiler
>
> Can it? In Ada at least, I understand that potentially dynamic-dispatching
> operations are really tough to inline. I suppose there could be something I
> don't know about C++ that gets rid of that issue. Is there?

The standard C++ container library does not use dynamic dispatching
for containers, it even suggests not to subclass them.  The container
library isn't very OOP.