From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,235659b21b3d24ab
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-23 02:52:37 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!195.86.7.162!newsfeed.wirehub.nl!newsfeed.germany.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Will there be a 3.14p version of GNAT?
Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2001 12:12:50 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <8766aajjvh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <2t2r7.26711$QK.21818615@news1.sttln1.wa.home.com>
 <5ee5b646.0109221629.62a32528@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13263
Date: 2001-09-23T12:12:50+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:

> This will be the last release in that form. After that,
> the GNAT sources will be part of the GCC 3.x release, and
> various people will build public releases from these
> sources, as happens for GNU C today.

Are there any ideas how to ensure binary compatibility across GNAT
builds from different distributors of the same operating system?

(I've got a draft of a GNU Ada Environment Specification in the attic,
but someone with intimate knowledge of the GNAT technology would have
to proofread it at this point.)