From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,ce0900b60ca3f616
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-11-09 06:44:36 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!newsfeeds.belnet.be!news.belnet.be!uni-erlangen.de!news-nue1.dfn.de!newsfeed.r-kom.de!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Better Finalisation [List container strawman]
Date: Fri, 09 Nov 2001 16:04:21 +0100
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <87668km1e2.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <kPoE7.9567$xS6.13287@www.newsranger.com>
 <9rti6v$hcu$1@news.huji.ac.il> <WOzE7.10186$xS6.14012@www.newsranger.com>
 <9sdnb2$dd4$1@news.huji.ac.il> <9seup3$12h0ar$2@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de>
 <5ee5b646.0111090536.5fe5852e@posting.google.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cancel-Lock: sha1:COCS9/aFgZXPbiY3gqmhGtxG8yY=
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:16124
Date: 2001-11-09T16:04:21+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

dewar@gnat.com (Robert Dewar) writes:

> Can we do more for the next version?

I would like to see a generic version of Ada.Finalization, to work
around the problem that all objects with finalizers have to be
declared at the library level.