From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,42e5b13fda5e9af4
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail
NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 02:40:48 -0600
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Building GNAT/GCC 4.2.0
References: <1164158881.380828.124800@e3g2000cwe.googlegroups.com>
	<mailman.27.1164185240.4389.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org>
	<1164212075.779099.103750@j44g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
	<87ac2ilf7p.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<1166140984.940697.186780@80g2000cwy.googlegroups.com>
	<1166141506.324745.283280@f1g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>
	<1166160318.002007.223550@l12g2000cwl.googlegroups.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2006 09:40:48 +0100
Message-ID: <8764cd1rhr.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:6vB/knOhsP94u8GfS3aIGEnFo60=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.225.3
X-Trace: 
 sv3-0e5MdMoRxQEjjr6dBakXMnrPdkFtGuh3GW/zc67ZQ2xz3N6z+KPNC1dngx/sQpFa25zA/Trdyp+HrbR!f86RhWO20Z7shP7BjUQfMs5kkWMKuzRq9CRPLWt+myjeABxWxcG5RcwloJGKqiZAU8y8Flrs
X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be
X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers
X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint
 properly
X-Postfilter: 1.3.32
Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:7918
Date: 2006-12-15T09:40:48+01:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

"deadlyhead" <s.brutzman@gmail.com> writes:

> Well, that didn't work.  Time to start hack-hack-hacking away.
>
> --Seth
>
> On Dec 14, 4:11 pm, "deadlyhead" <s.brutz...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Crap.  I just realized that the `-gnatpg' switch is what's causing
>> this.  However, I thought that the `p' was supposed to suppress the
>> checks, thus counteracting the warnings-as-errors implied by `-gnatg'.
>> I doubt very much that I want to remove `-gnatg' switches.  I'll try
>> explicitly changing all occurrences of `-gnatpg' to `-gnatg -gnatp' in
>> the Make files.
>> 
>> --Seth

GNAT automatically compiles all units under the Ada.*, System.*, and
Interfaces.* hierarchies with -gnatpg; you can't turn that off.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.
A: No.
Q: Should I include quotations after my reply?