From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,3a1c64628a09855b X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news4.google.com!news.germany.com!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Lack of formal syntax undermines Ada Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 00:01:34 +0200 Message-ID: <8763ultnwh.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1208124094 11486 212.9.189.177 (13 Apr 2008 22:01:34 GMT) X-Complaints-To: Cancel-Lock: sha1:9ph69tslqNwd/FlcZTf9RhEmY+Y= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:20923 Date: 2008-04-14T00:01:34+02:00 List-Id: * John McCabe: > Bugger - where did I get that idea from then (have to admit, it's been > a while since I paid a lot of attention to Ada!) There's the saying that in Ada, functions can have side effects all over the place, but you can't express that in the function's declaration.