From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,29d8139471e3f53e X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder.news-service.com!feeder.erje.net!news.internetdienste.de!newsfeed.velia.net!news.tu-darmstadt.de!news.belwue.de!rz.uni-karlsruhe.de!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Preventing type extensions Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2010 21:51:16 +0200 Message-ID: <8762xxd0az.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> References: <87iq2bfenl.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <874odv9npv.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <87y6b7cedd.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <66a3704c-54f9-4f04-8860-aa12f516134b@t3g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> <87d3sib44t.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> <134q4k2ly2pf4$.17nlv1q6q5ivo.dlg@40tude.net> <4c8dec8e$0$6990$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net> <8f6cceFrv2U1@mid.individual.net> <135a7dc9-3943-45e4-884b-3cc6bce3db0a@q18g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <81799aab-a2e8-4390-8f42-abceaa5fc032@m1g2000vbh.googlegroups.com> <5c0d7798-ba09-4bd0-a28f-f1b028cce927@y3g2000vbm.googlegroups.com> <87r5gl8tky.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: idssi.enyo.de 1285185076 6023 172.17.135.6 (22 Sep 2010 19:51:16 GMT) X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de Cancel-Lock: sha1:uIR4HoUbyXJIynmk3TX6WXJd58Y= Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:14193 Date: 2010-09-22T21:51:16+02:00 List-Id: * Ludovic Brenta: > Another area where Ada helps certification is where it distinguishes > pool-specific from general access types. C and C++ are both completely > helpless in this respect. Consider: > > type T_Access is access T'Class; -- no equivalent in C++ > type T_General_Access is access all T'Class; -- equivalent to T* in C++ Iterators are examples of pool-specific allocators in C++. It's also common to define your own pointer types in C++. It's hard to beat the C++ type system in terms of expressiveness. > Hey, just a wild idea: how about > > type T_Stack_Access is access aliased T; > > which indicates that access values of this type can *only* designate > aliased objects that are on the stack, and never on the heap? I don't think this would provide useful information. Tasks blur the boundary between heap and stack allocation.