From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Successor Language Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2018 15:36:55 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <87602fbu2g.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <5e86db65-84b9-4b5b-9aea-427a658b5ae7@googlegroups.com> <878t7u1cfm.fsf@nightsong.com> <776f3645-ed0c-4118-9b4d-21660e3bba4b@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="fd45807aef667ac86160f2c81693b43a"; logging-data="1676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GR0Lc+NvUgM+RA4A/w/a4" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZOCdFFuCbgAFpuZQyVoClT6xBKU= sha1:dEJQ4Lbk1MewLaugOA+SxTLeGg0= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53150 Date: 2018-06-18T15:36:55-07:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > P.S. Stepanov arguing for generics (templates) claimed that the reason > why C++ needed this mess was impossibility to write Max using dynamic > polymorphism... I believe it is possible to have a language where > generic Max and Swap could be written without generics. I've been wanting to look up how Ada generics work. C++ generics are implemented with templates which leads to a horrible mess, but generics themselves don't have to be a mess, as far as I know. Some comparisons: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.110.122&rep=rep1&type=pdf