From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada Successor Language Date: Mon, 25 Jun 2018 01:21:41 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <8760278eei.fsf@nightsong.com> References: <5e86db65-84b9-4b5b-9aea-427a658b5ae7@googlegroups.com> <878t7u1cfm.fsf@nightsong.com> <776f3645-ed0c-4118-9b4d-21660e3bba4b@googlegroups.com> <87602fbu2g.fsf@nightsong.com> <87po0mziqt.fsf@nightsong.com> <30e271d8-0ef9-4986-8726-2b09c7fb9526@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="6a8eddcd6eeacc39461828a6cd1dbc16"; logging-data="9190"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX184azwwb+J+M6UHn3otDW7x" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:nKR7caehYhiVjclSvgUAd1BXrn4= sha1:cH2ctnGjgX+0MlXjEqQD+jqJnZY= Xref: reader02.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:53288 Date: 2018-06-25T01:21:41-07:00 List-Id: "Dmitry A. Kazakov" writes: > Generics are automatically at disadvantage, even performance-wise, > because in all contexts where types are statically known there is no > dispatch in Ada. Since generics are always static in all comparable > cases dynamically polymorphic calls are statically resolved. Why are generics worse performance-wise then? If the type can be statically deduced then the compiler can generate specialized code. Do you use ML? Do you think its module language is also bad?