From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,b04385af440bf119
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: Sebastien Tanguy <sebastien.tanguy@wanadoo.fr>
Subject: Re: pretty-print? and ada specific debugger?
Date: 1998/10/11
Message-ID: <874stbgwj8.fsf@nexus.wanadoo.fr>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 399908881
References: <6vh09g$mcl$1@usenet43.supernews.com>
Organization: Wanadoo - (Client of French Internet Provider)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1998-10-11T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

> Two quick questions:
>   1. does a pretty printer exist under linux for gnat Ada95 files?

you may try a2ps which is included in most linux distributions (RH, Debian)
 
>   2. the gdb which came with linux's gcc development system is pretty
> Ada95-stupid.
>        Is there a gnat-enhanced gdb I should be using?

as already said, you need to patch gdb, and AFAIK, even if you want
to use ddd (which uses gdb)

							A+

seb.

-- 
	  "... say... Livin' on a train track..."
GCS/U -d+ H+ !g !au a- w+ v* C++ UL++ P++ L++ E-- N++ !W M? 5+ 
tv++ b+++ u- h++ !f r--- !y+