From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,13edb2cb3610f78b,start
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-09-30 02:52:29 PST
Path: 
 archiver1.google.com!news1.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!small.news.tele.dk!151.189.0.75!newsfeed.germany.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Package renaming declaration and child units
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2001 12:13:30 +0200
Organization: Enyo's not your organization
Message-ID: <874rplc7g5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:13541
Date: 2001-09-30T12:13:30+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

If I have a package renaming declaration R for a package P, can
I refer to package P.C by R.C, too?  I get some strange effects
using GNAT over here (no consistent pattern yet).  RM 8.5.3 is not
especially helpful, and I'm not familiar with the visiblity rules. :-/