From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,104df2b9b7a2f689
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Path: 
 g2news1.google.com!news3.google.com!news2.google.com!proxad.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!feed.news.tiscali.de!news.belwue.de!LF.net!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Interfaces
Date: Tue, 17 May 2005 12:53:43 +0200
Message-ID: <874qd2cedk.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
References: <8764xj9wzf.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<wccoebbj8ta.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com> <877jhz0y52.fsf@deneb.enyo.de>
	<1787554.lkqyR2uNLM@jellix.jlfencey.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1116327228 5048 212.9.189.177 (17 May 2005 10:53:48
 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: 
Cancel-Lock: sha1:GmQLmyTsUndVHQU7aJAkjuXjjRg=
Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:11062
Date: 2005-05-17T12:53:43+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Vinzent Hoefler:

> Florian Weimer wrote:
>
>> I wasn't sure, after reading the Java language specification, if Java
>> interfaces had the same problem. 8->
>
> They do.

And this behavior doesn't cause problems in practice?  Of course, this
would be a rather strong indicator that no additional complexity is
necessary. 8-)