From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,d92cd733dc93e4e4 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 10:49:54 -0500 From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Gnat 3.15p @ win-2000 recompiles _all_ internal packages ... References: Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 17:49:43 +0200 Message-ID: <874pzagne0.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5Y5/je85ioB4o7FYRG4abxfnVgI= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.58.65 X-Trace: sv3-QwTE+4Y/Xro8yTt+zIWVvAx0eATr7IdyKvRYdjTGjazLwsnY8glRU3792v2Ky4Ag5pMBalVw4pRrgzI!ZF9PareNaxEg1Xw8bGiDgS5pohVU8+YFIB6YSGga1XvkbsMZKN7dc2vw8QdT3Lt40aQOB6+n X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:4567 Date: 2006-05-28T17:49:43+02:00 List-Id: M E Leypold writes: > As I understood that, gnatmake should only remake the internal > packages in this situation if the corresponding *.ali- and > *.o-Files are not up to date. > > Actually that is not what happens: Under Debian it works as I > expected, but under Windows a lot of internal packages are recompiled > to project-local *.ali and *.o files. It is almost as if gnatmake > can't see the packages in .../lib/adalib/. > > All installed files in .../lib/adalib/ are (as far as I can see) much > younger then the sources in .../lib/adainclude/. So that doesn't seem > to be the reason why things go wrong. > > Does anybody here have an idea what I'm missing? >From the top of my head: look at the file permissions, and make sure that the .ali files for the GNAT internal units are read-only for all users. -- Ludovic Brenta.