From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,7684e927a2475d0 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news3.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!bcklog1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2006 17:13:41 -0500 From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: can one build commercial applications with latest gnat and other licenses related questions... References: <449d2a28$0$11075$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <449d5c03$0$11074$9b4e6d93@newsread4.arcor-online.net> <6sbqsh6jv7.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de> <87Wng.5800$FQ1.910@attbi_s71> <44A18113.3060309@obry.net> <44A18842.5000908@obry.net> Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:13:49 +0200 Message-ID: <874py6nt5u.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:vuXZY850JgkFRFvZv7VYnlMMu0o= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.244.104 X-Trace: sv3-pTovpjHvOLX22Y8nLv22hx8vK7tq02z9ksI1sKTvxqqRy05x3zjhn7+ZhQk4sqxXX2FLQJqXcHvyTvf!FO2GJ/fiJu/JZgitmOLGI0XNLFquTdjfcBFEIq0i9HzaomQtvHzwO7l2aa5Fgp5472YzpLOgWwg= X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:5135 Date: 2006-06-28T00:13:49+02:00 List-Id: Michael Bode writes: > Pascal Obry writes: > >> You can never change the past. So I do not understand what you are saying. > > I'd bet GtkAda 2.4 once was GMGPL. Ludovic Brenta thought that too. M > E Leypold had some quotes to that effect in > . > > And now we learn that GtkAda 2.4 never was under GMGPL but GPL. That's > what I call changing the past. No, we do not learn that. AdaCore was quite specific in saying they're not saying anything at all about the past. -- Ludovic Brenta.