From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: 103376,6aa1ec264ce25142
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,domainid0,public,usenet
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.180.75.8 with SMTP id y8mr2598937wiv.4.1346182901949;
        Tue, 28 Aug 2012 12:41:41 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 e9ni61332799wia.0!nntp.google.com!proxad.net!feeder1-2.proxad.net!feeder.erje.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Real syntax problems in Ada
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 21:41:41 +0200
Message-ID: <874nnmhki2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <1p5r39cusgc1n$.18nj9sytckk6$.dlg@40tude.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1346182900 7675 172.17.135.6 (28 Aug 2012 19:41:40 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:RAybZfXKBRrMpscaCZcwOwDergQ=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-08-28T21:41:41+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Dmitry A. Kazakov:

> What are real problems with Ada syntax as opposed to the imaginary ones
> (e.g. Ada does not look like C, Forth, Elder Futhark, you name it)?

There is no convenient way to write zero-element and one-element array
aggregates.