From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Paul Rubin Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: If not Ada, what else... Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:20:59 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Message-ID: <874ml0yv84.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> References: <29dd5458-f9ce-4db8-9128-8ab35a9ce5f8@googlegroups.com> <64bc671c-72e5-4924-b703-3b907c69949c@googlegroups.com> <877fq9uj6g.fsf@theworld.com> <65061686-5c8f-433b-9b11-9e228298158e@googlegroups.com> <87k2u96jms.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <06f8a6f9-d219-4d40-b9ac-8518e93839bd@googlegroups.com> <87y4io63jy.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <7a29d3e9-d1bd-4f4a-b1a6-14d3e1a83a4d@googlegroups.com> <87mvz36fen.fsf@jester.gateway.sonic.net> <2215b44f-8a89-47c6-a4c4-52b74d2dac45@googlegroups.com> <9e492c82-868d-43d3-a18a-38274400e337@googlegroups.com> <40184feb-4053-4ac3-8eaa-c3bd9cd8a77c@googlegroups.com> <10272577-945f-4682-85bc-8ad47f3653ae@googlegroups.com> <4ae21218-2148-434b-8acc-162f1cce594f@googlegroups.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: mx02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="d4217d68945dedf510265c644f2a7daa"; logging-data="24717"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+lwSmN1g0Mj6Klzb8PTQIm" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:cwtWXrZtM4phMjC+Zy3jC+1P6j0= sha1:Qt1jvTVS2Hy7t2LW5N3EyP1o7yg= Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:26890 Date: 2015-07-19T09:20:59-07:00 List-Id: David Botton writes: > No, I meant Ada. GNAT = Ada since there is not likely to be another > implementation of the language nor even an update of any compilers to > the current or future standards. Are you serious, is GNAT really the only implementation of Ada 2012? I see a huge list of Ada 95 implementations here: http://www.ada-auth.org/cpl/lists/CPLbase.html And I figured that the updates only stopped because (per J-P. Rosen's recent post) vendors aren't doing ACAA validations any more. I know some of those vendors are still selling product but I don't know that they've been updated for Ada 2012. I don't see what's so difficult about it if customers are asking for it--the changes are not that large.