From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID
	autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
X-Google-Thread: 103376,8911e86e455fd86c
X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public
From: jerry@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl (Jerry van Dijk)
Subject: Re: NT/Ada 95 Port
Date: 1997/09/13
Message-ID: <874129958.53snx@jvdsys.nextjk.stuyts.nl>#1/1
X-Deja-AN: 272053900
Distribution: world
References: <3418AA20.51FE@ccis.adisys.com.au>
Organization: *JerryWare HQ*, Leiden, Holland
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Date: 1997-09-13T00:00:00+00:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>


In article <3418AA20.51FE@ccis.adisys.com.au> zhao@ccis.adisys.com.au writes:

>Our company is planning to port some Ada code from UNIX to NT.  The Ada
>code
>is used to build a couple of background executables (without GUI
>interfaces).
>However they use quite a bit of IPC, socket IO, file IO and multicast.

The first decision would be to use either a very unix like enviroment
like GNAT or go for a native NT solution (ie: use a Win32 binding).

--

-- Jerry van Dijk | Leiden, Holland
-- Consultant     | Team Ada
-- Ordina Finance | jdijk@acm.org