From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fdf33079a629ecb6 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-14 01:33:31 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: GNAT for Alpha Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2001 10:49:46 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <873d7z6gk5.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <9ff447f2.0106280804.5f40b84c@posting.google.com> <3B3B59D3.C7CADF66@nbi.dk> <9ff447f2.0106300409.1cc6fcbe@posting.google.com> <3B4DAA01.56DABD2D@nbi.dk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:9938 Date: 2001-07-14T10:49:46+02:00 List-Id: Jacob Sparre Andersen writes: > As far as I know, yes. "Tru64-Unix" is just a new label for > "Digital Unix", which at some point has also been called > "OSF". OSF and Digital Unix were two entirely different beasts. Some DECstations were sold with Digital Unix and the promise that they will be able to run OSF/1, but DEC never managed to release it to the public. AFAIK, OSF/1 was only available for two architectures (the Intel Paragon was one of them, the other DEC Alpha), and it never resulted in the unified Unix the industry was looking for. The local university is still upset about this. :-/