From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,5bef5e9c5bedc675 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2004-01-03 05:11:02 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!news2.google.com!news.maxwell.syr.edu!newsfeed00.sul.t-online.de!newsfeed01.sul.t-online.de!t-online.de!news.belwue.de!news.uni-stuttgart.de!news.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: [No_Elaboration_Code] GNAT still generating rep_to_pos, why? Date: 03 Jan 2004 14:11:00 +0100 Message-ID: <873cax6uu3.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <878ykp71fn.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: albireo.enyo.de 1073135461 19060 212.9.189.171 (3 Jan 2004 13:11:01 GMT) User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:4070 Date: 2004-01-03T14:11:00+01:00 List-Id: "Luke A. Guest" writes: > >> 2) I have set up my SP_Block record instance to be located at a particular > >> memory address, yet the compiler still generates code to initialise this > >> structure. > > > > pragma Import with convention Ada (or C) should help. > The compiler still generates that code. This looks like a bug in the FSF version of GNAT.