From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,a326ac15995ef20e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news1.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 14:23:14 -0500 From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Debian build scripts on a public Monotone server References: <871wpzd7js.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> <4519647E.3020308@obry.net> Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 21:23:52 +0200 Message-ID: <873baea0tz.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:JIt9ZXYsFXLotoPNTl2otU7i1Z0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.218.136 X-Trace: sv3-FwOOqY4cwNVreiis/LdyVyjfzCV1GXeTMEZrYTVkftXAtJONEWpvq7ynO3OHV03AeTcKwbvhDUu+JLH!RmHeyDmqETVL4hp4OC/5yTq6y1oGHYov96JwzorqavpXYi1S+SKlnmxg1TNCF9A3+UH3ryssTjM= X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:6757 Date: 2006-09-26T21:23:52+02:00 List-Id: Pascal Obry writes: > Well, well! Tracking merges is planed for version 2.0. We need to give > time to Subversion. It used to be a CVS "like" project for compatibility > issued. Subversion 2.0 is on the way and the developers are going to do > things as it should have been done now... So Subversion 2.0 will > probably break compatibility with current version for good! > > Let's not dismiss such a nice tool so easily ;) You're kidding, right? If it takes them 4 versions (or more) and a major compatibility-breaking rewrite to get things "as [they] should have been done", then I don't see how Subversion is "a nice tool". -- Ludovic Brenta.