From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,56525db28240414a
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.216.138.27 with SMTP id z27mr2481019wei.13.1343314129445;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.180.88.195 with SMTP id bi3mr1307065wib.3.1343314129384;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 07:48:49 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 q11ni71877290wiw.1!nntp.google.com!16no9912067wil.1!news-out.google.com!ge7ni75786472wib.0!nntp.google.com!volia.net!news2.volia.net!feed-A.news.volia.net!border1.nntp.ams2.giganews.com!border3.nntp.ams.giganews.com!border1.nntp.ams.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!texta.sil.at!news.visyn.net!visyn.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: Efficient Sequential Access to Arrays
Date: Sun, 22 Jul 2012 20:41:29 +0200
Message-ID: <87394j3ag6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <01983f1c-f842-4b1f-a180-bcef531dad4c@googlegroups.com>
	<87ipdf4vh6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<c78d4020-f6e5-4557-a413-389a788ec44b@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1342982488 22969 172.17.135.6 (22 Jul 2012 18:41:28 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:w2XytO33DgrrSH618pFxg8TihOk=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-07-22T20:41:29+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Keean Schupke:

> What is the best way to do that? The program uses extensive inlining
> and optimisation, so individual functions are hard to find in the
> output. By the time its compiled its about a single 32k function.

-gnatG shows you Ada-like code which is passed to the compiler
middle-end, and -fdump-tree-all writes files showing the results of
individual passes.