From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,3e341f7795ed8bda
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.74.6 with SMTP id p6mr1675343pav.5.1343316762813;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:32:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.66.89.225 with SMTP id br1mr1658581pab.3.1343316685142;
        Thu, 26 Jul 2012 08:31:25 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 b9ni65145361pbl.0!nntp.google.com!u4no38514pbs.0!news-out.google.com!p10ni61947386pbh.1!nntp.google.com!npeer01.iad.highwinds-media.com!news.highwinds-media.com!feed-me.highwinds-media.com!nx02.iad01.newshosting.com!newshosting.com!194.74.65.76.MISMATCH!news-peer0!news-peer1!btnet!zen.net.uk!hamilton.zen.co.uk!xlned.com!feeder5.xlned.com!feed.xsnews.nl!border-1.ams.xsnews.nl!newsfeed.straub-nv.de!news.swapon.de!feeder.erje.net!news2.arglkargh.de!news.albasani.net!news.szaf.org!news.gnuher.de!news.enyo.de!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: pragma Convention() Ada2012
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2012 22:37:14 +0200
Message-ID: <87394iw6x1.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
References: <a063401d-5357-4c58-b01a-316b9a8a6015@googlegroups.com>
	<a70gj6Fab3U1@mid.individual.net>
	<1olyz5p5952ya.i7joo9fs065h.dlg@40tude.net>
	<87vchgu8w7.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
	<a42997fc-cf8a-4cb6-a2c4-6bc6a217159b@googlegroups.com>
	<23d960aa-3f5b-4710-aa9e-bbb1782bc54c@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Trace: news.enyo.de 1343075833 14597 172.17.135.6 (23 Jul 2012 20:37:13 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@enyo.de
Cancel-Lock: sha1:LFq5WA4/qgMZTKq1jejCI7OoUkU=
X-Received-Bytes: 1711
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-07-23T22:37:14+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

* Adam Beneschan:

> On Saturday, July 21, 2012 10:17:24 PM UTC-7, Shark8 wrote:
>> On Saturday, July 21, 2012 3:00:40 PM UTC-6, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> > 
>> > I don't think this is possible in general because the entity has
>> > usually been frozen at that point.
>> 
>> I think you're right; the Specification file *must* be able to provide the
>> correct information on generating subprogram-calls, which is impacted by
>> conventions, but I know you can put the convention-pragmas in the private
>> section.
>
> Yes, usually.  I think Florian is confused.

Yes, I am.  Thanks for setting me straight.