From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4
X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,221c61113210e0ef
X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet
X-Google-NewGroupId: yes
X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit
Received: by 10.66.74.40 with SMTP id q8mr1612415pav.19.1344325013776;
        Tue, 07 Aug 2012 00:36:53 -0700 (PDT)
Path: 
 p10ni3204332pbh.1!nntp.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!ctu-peer!news.nctu.edu.tw!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!mx04.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada
Subject: Re: astyle/cindent for Ada?
Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2012 22:04:45 +0200
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID: <873947bste.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
References: <2df5566c-c219-4226-b41e-78ed47190bc4@googlegroups.com>
	<87txwtp074.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org>
	<465a69d5-f9b5-4d56-aa0a-4c91b6f093de@googlegroups.com>
	<a9900252-39ff-45b9-b66a-b449bd5e7870@googlegroups.com>
	<87e01249-b22b-4cc3-a1c7-a00b5cb9252d@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Injection-Info: mx04.eternal-september.org;
 posting-host="ee24192cbca4353bca5bdb1988e03b50";
	logging-data="22716"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";
	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+cke51KMOoLSMVRd+wQ7Em"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:tDaCXZUGwr7GMwVjUSqdijBe7H0=
	sha1:WKDeWyQPOcoQiUzjpomiwS6Ey+Q=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: 2012-07-31T22:04:45+02:00
List-Id: <comp.lang.ada>

awdorrin <awdorrin@gmail.com> writes:
> Adding '-cargs -gnatI' - to ignore the rep-specs - 'gnatpp' appears to
> work properly.
>
> Still not sure why 'gnatpp' is seeing the rep-spec as bad, while
> gnatmake does not see any issues with it...

This might be a bug in ASIS or in gnatpp itself and not in the compiler.

Anyway this is not the bug I was thinking of.  Please consider trying
asis-programs 2010-5 (currently in Debian testing) against your sources
before the final release of Debian 7 "Wheezy", so I know whether or not
I should invest time in fixing this bug.

-- 
Ludovic Brenta.