From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FORGED_GMAIL_RCVD, FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: a07f3367d7,9192417d428824a0 X-Google-Attributes: gida07f3367d7,public,usenet X-Google-NewGroupId: yes X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,CP1252 Path: g2news1.google.com!postnews.google.com!s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail From: Vadim Godunko Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Problem with QTAda 3.0 and QTCore4.dll on Windows Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 23:10:25 -0800 (PST) Organization: http://groups.google.com Message-ID: <872e99c3-5dbc-4ac0-8a82-050b63fc7352@s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com> References: <1660bebd-45ca-4568-b92a-380614d94ecc@c34g2000yqn.googlegroups.com> <8ec14209-e505-4873-86b4-294149841777@v25g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <199i04cdgiqlc$.1tlj9wnffh6g9$.dlg@40tude.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: 93.178.112.35 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: posting.google.com 1262934625 6649 127.0.0.1 (8 Jan 2010 07:10:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 07:10:25 +0000 (UTC) Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: s3g2000yqs.googlegroups.com; posting-host=93.178.112.35; posting-account=niG3UgoAAAD7iQ3takWjEn_gw6D9X3ww User-Agent: G2/1.0 X-HTTP-UserAgent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.6) Gecko/20091201 SUSE/3.5.6-1.1.1 Firefox/3.5.6,gzip(gfe),gzip(gfe) Xref: g2news1.google.com comp.lang.ada:8666 Date: 2010-01-07T23:10:25-08:00 List-Id: On Jan 8, 1:32=A0am, Hibou57 (Yannick Duch=EAne) wrote: > > While I do not know about the technical details, I use to read from > place to place, GNAT provides a custom support for interfacing Ada and > C++ library, as well as ObjectAda does, if I'm not wrong. > GNAT C++ interface feature is expected to be used only with C++ code compiled by G++. Don't known about ObjectAda, may be it can interface with MSVC. > Honestly, I do not like so called =93 portable =94 UIs (personal feeling > with reasons), but although I do not really enjoy it, it seems to me > GTK is easier to use than Qt (and more lightweight in most of case). > Because I am one of authors of QtAda, I let others to compare GtkAda and QtAda. :-)