From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,f8544883f4f8ab29 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: Samuel Tardieu Subject: Re: Compiler implementation of speciallized needs annexes. Date: 1999/02/26 Message-ID: <871zjdi7ur.fsf@zaphod.enst.fr>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 448712847 References: <36D3A1EF.E7CA2A8C@physics.BLAH.purdue.BLAH.edu> <7b2mpq$194$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> <7b47q2$cnd$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com> Mail-Copies-To: sam@ada.eu.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Complaints-To: usenet@enst.enst.fr X-Trace: enst.enst.fr 920037564 15050 137.194.160.95 (26 Feb 1999 13:59:24 GMT) Organization: TELECOM Paris User-Agent: Gnus/5.070077 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.77) XEmacs/21.2(beta3) (Aglaia) Mime-Version: 1.0 NNTP-Posting-Date: 26 Feb 1999 13:59:24 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1999-02-26T13:59:24+00:00 List-Id: >>>>> "TED" == dennison writes: TED> Are they supposed to be able to? That would indeed be very cool, TED> but I didn't get that impression reading the annex myself. Well, nothing in the Annex requires (or even encourages!) this, but other compilers could chose to use GNAT's PCS (Partition Communication Subsystem, a.k.a the runtime library) in a compatible way. Sam -- Samuel Tardieu -- sam@ada.eu.org