From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,fd63afa4dc364b7e X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-03-17 11:10:04 PST Path: supernews.google.com!sn-xit-03!supernews.com!freenix!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!newsfeed.germany.net!newsfeed2.easynews.net!easynews.net!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Support for per allocation pool selection (was: Better support for garbage collection) Date: 17 Mar 2001 20:19:10 +0100 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <871yrw2ogh.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <98m938$2iod0$1@ID-25716.news.dfncis.de> <861ys03t2f.fsf@acm.org> <86bsr15wft.fsf@acm.org> <86itl8v8ps.fsf_-_@acm.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: supernews.google.com comp.lang.ada:5809 Date: 2001-03-17T20:19:10+01:00 List-Id: Laurent Guerby writes: > pragma Use_Pool_Object (T_Ptr, Pool_Object); > > then all allocations (via new) of type T_Ptr use the given Pool_Object > in the current scope (and until the next pragma), no new syntax then. Are there other pragmas with a similarly scoped effect?