From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,bc1361a952ec75ca X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-ArrivalTime: 2001-07-31 01:45:10 PST Path: archiver1.google.com!newsfeed.google.com!newsfeed.stanford.edu!news.tele.dk!193.174.75.178!news-fra1.dfn.de!news-koe1.dfn.de!news-han1.dfn.de!news.fh-hannover.de!news.cid.net!news.enyo.de!news1.enyo.de!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: How to make Ada a dominant language Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2001 11:00:04 +0200 Organization: Enyo's not your organization Message-ID: <871ymxxyln.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <3B655376.F356E34@sneakemail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Xref: archiver1.google.com comp.lang.ada:10849 Date: 2001-07-31T11:00:04+02:00 List-Id: Russ Paielli <18k11tm001@sneakemail.com> writes: > It is just unnatural and awkward, even if long-time Ada programmers > are so used to it they think it is natural. In a previous article, Russ Paielli <18k11tm001@sneakemail.com> writes, in response to Preben's statement that he likes the variable-first form better than the type-first form: > I'll bet nine out of 10 non-Ada-programmers would disagree with you. Maybe we can convert you completely if we post a few more articles. ;-)