From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,e8023133274ae02c X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news4.google.com!border1.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.giganews.com!local01.nntp.dca.giganews.com!nntp.scarlet.biz!news.scarlet.biz.POSTED!not-for-mail NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 00:23:17 -0500 From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: procedural vs object oriented References: <1146039364.130635.181590@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com> Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2006 07:22:21 +0200 Message-ID: <871wvjh9te.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:z2/GBVG0VSTIWGNrhOxDFeQWCvg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.235.57.185 X-Trace: sv3-eZTuoUEUnzJrh0gYBQjupESvBPHXu75+msZV7pyjdnZMxyk6QTwy249YheRETAYnlGqTPa5IWPGSBx/!WsYqSpRwNNPNlRDTypdElnD7WX7wr/iSoo0vO0NQ6YEVTImRkwI2DXTzqIWGQpdFuPU3mtl3tg== X-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.be X-DMCA-Complaints-To: abuse@scarlet.biz X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Please be sure to forward a copy of ALL headers X-Abuse-and-DMCA-Info: Otherwise we will be unable to process your complaint properly X-Postfilter: 1.3.32 Xref: g2news2.google.com comp.lang.ada:3941 Date: 2006-04-27T07:22:21+02:00 List-Id: "bh" writes: > "Ananth the Boss" wrote in message > news:1146039364.130635.181590@v46g2000cwv.googlegroups.com... >> i am working in Ada based flight software development project.as a >> means of improving i took to the CASE tool based development.ours is a >> procedural approach of development.but the commercial CASE tools speak >> a lot about class/object/UML.how will this suit for procedure oriented >> development where we dont have necessity to identify classes and do >> detailed design as mentioned in OO aproach >> > > If you don't _know_ how to do good OO with Ada, I'd recommend against it. > We tried a project using OO and I think it is pretty safe to say we didn't > get what we were hoping for. I think your results will be better with > procedural. According to Robert Dewar during FOSDEM, nobody uses OOP in avionics software, because the uncertainty inherent to dynamic dispatching hinders certification. Is someone on this newsgroup in a position to give a counter-example? -- Ludovic Brenta.