From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Thread: 103376,24c70f80132ea540 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public,usenet X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit Path: g2news2.google.com!news2.google.com!news3.google.com!feeder1-2.proxad.net!proxad.net!feeder1-1.proxad.net!feeder.news-service.com!feeder4.cambrium.nl!feeder1.cambrium.nl!feeder5.cambrium.nl!feed.tweaknews.nl!not-for-mail From: Ludovic Brenta Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: No networking in Florist? References: <1192474217.628674.65600@v29g2000prd.googlegroups.com> <1192564043.758890.163550@e34g2000pro.googlegroups.com> Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 00:03:57 +0200 Message-ID: <871wbuk982.fsf@ludovic-brenta.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:t4Ra3qOxL1ZvsUaj4AoIT1lmyvk= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Organization: Tele2 X-Trace: DXC=[[YHjCPgC;^a_TfYjjFOaX6`Y6aWje^YZnYKVK10We3SW]bN@bm:aA_GX:VG1lg1EZ Manuel Gomez writes: > On 16 oct, 09:18, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: >> Manuel Gomez wrote: >> > On 14 oct, 07:01, Jacob Sparre Andersen wrote: >> >> What's the reason that Florist (the POSIX.5 interface) doesn't >> >> include networking? >> > We have POSIX.Sockets, isn't that enough for networking? >> >> I can't find them in the versions of Florist I have on my systems >> (Debian/unstable and Ubuntu/7.04). >> > > I'm now aware that I had got installed an old package of Florist named > libflorist-3.15p-1-dev which seems to be removed from Debian Etch [1]. > The new package in Debian, libflorist-dev 2006-1, does not include > posix-sockets. > > The Sourceforge project [2] does come with sockets. > > I wonder why. May be sockets support is buggy with current compiler? I maintain the Debian packages. I did not remove sockets from Florist; they were removed upstream. Can you live with GNAT.Sockets as an alternative? -- Ludovic Brenta.