From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: ** X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_05,INVALID_DATE, MSGID_SHORT,REPLYTO_WITHOUT_TO_CC autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!samsung!dali!ogicse!emory!hubcap!billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu From: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu (William Thomas Wolfe, 2847 ) Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Subject: Re: Ada and the SEI and CACM Viewpoint Message-ID: <8710@hubcap.clemson.edu> Date: 12 Apr 90 16:33:37 GMT References: <9004111439.AA23790@fa.sei.cmu.edu> Sender: news@hubcap.clemson.edu Reply-To: billwolf%hazel.cs.clemson.edu@hubcap.clemson.edu List-Id: >From Judy.Bamberger@SEI.CMU.EDU: >>>> I hope that in addition to any discussion that might take place >>>> here in comp.lang.ada, someone from the SEI will write to CACM to >>>> straighten out these two regarding the feasibility (yes) and the >>>> general advisability (no) of automatic Fortran-to-Ada translation, >>>> as well as the alternative strategy of using pragma Interface, and > > As an employee of the SEI, I would respectfully like to remind the readers of > this newsgroup that "SEI" translates into "Software Engineering Institute" - > *NOT* "Ada Engineering Institute." While we do some Ada work here, we > primarily do software engineering, education, and technology transition, An example of which can be found in SEI-87-TR-9, "Ada Adoption Handbook: A Program Manager's Guide", by John Foreman and John Goodenough, which on page 52 (Section 7.4, Translating Languages) gives a good analysis of automatic translation as a general strategy for Ada-language transition. The authors of this SEI Technical Report would be in a good position to write CACM regarding the points raised above (>>>> section...), since they clearly have already considered the question in considerably greater detail than have either of the two CACM "viewpoint" authors. Bill Wolfe, wtwolfe@hubcap.clemson.edu