From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Received: by 10.25.80.7 with SMTP id e7mr3228560lfb.7.1466540027701; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.157.42.81 with SMTP id t75mr592419ota.1.1466540027595; Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) Path: eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!mx02.eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!goblin3!goblin1!goblin.stu.neva.ru!oe3no7400702lbb.1!news-out.google.com!f5ni939lbb.0!nntp.google.com!w10no5601997lbo.0!postnews.google.com!glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com!not-for-mail Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 13:13:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: Complaints-To: groups-abuse@google.com Injection-Info: glegroupsg2000goo.googlegroups.com; posting-host=198.135.236.252; posting-account=ENgozAkAAACH-stq5yXctoDQeZQP2E6J NNTP-Posting-Host: 198.135.236.252 References: <66c14298-c62d-4f4b-b0c0-e969454f9334@googlegroups.com> <2e39857a-7121-476b-807a-d2bff1e598f4@googlegroups.com> <431af616-7df3-4e4d-9262-26ed68cb74c7@googlegroups.com> <037df2b8-b9c4-4447-87ee-cc89d7072b30@googlegroups.com> <15914c54-191c-4f37-b754-282855d1aeaf@googlegroups.com> <3e25c9a0-469c-4487-b78e-6f87434f87fa@googlegroups.com> <2e69ca6f-484c-4d58-b0fe-d17a744b1418@googlegroups.com> <9ada1cdc-2fbd-4009-99f1-aba71ac1b9d2@googlegroups.com> User-Agent: G2/1.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Message-ID: <870a6538-0876-40c0-ad2d-d4c1793f7a99@googlegroups.com> Subject: Re: Generic Embedded List Nodes From: Warren Injection-Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 20:13:47 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Xref: news.eternal-september.org comp.lang.ada:30863 Date: 2016-06-21T13:13:47-07:00 List-Id: On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 14:56:06 UTC-4, Niklas Holsti wrote: > On 16-06-21 20:13 , Jeffrey R. Carter wrote: > > On Tuesday, 21 June 2016 01:52:51 UTC-4, Niklas Holsti wrote: > >> > >> The component My_Recd.Name, of the controlled type Unbounded_String, is > >> making Object_Type also controlled. I well understand that the compiler > >> does not want controlled objects to be overlaid with address clauses. > > > > Funny how this application cannot possibly meet its timing requirements if it > > does any allocation/deallocation, yet can meet its timing requirements using > > Unbounded_String, which does allocation/deallocation internally. > > Perhaps the Unbounded_Strings are altered very rarely, but the > linked-list operations are frequent. I only added the Unbounded_String for an example test program because Niklas wanted to see what I was going to use. So now I'll just leave the group to expend their excess energy on any further debate. Warren