From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on polar.synack.me X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.3 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,INVALID_MSGID autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Google-Language: ENGLISH,ASCII-7-bit X-Google-Thread: 103376,86616b1931cbdae5 X-Google-Attributes: gid103376,public From: rodney@wat.hookup.net Subject: Re: Is Ada likely to survive ? Date: 1997/08/06 Message-ID: <870923638.11989@dejanews.com>#1/1 X-Deja-AN: 262684084 References: <97080410223317@psavax.pwfl.com> <5sag85$9n2@portal.gmu.edu> X-Http-User-Agent: Mozilla/3.01 (WinNT; I) X-Originating-IP-Addr: 165.154.97.43 (rodney.wat.hookup.net) Organization: Deja News Posting Service X-Authenticated-Sender: rodney@wat.hookup.net X-Article-Creation-Date: Thu Aug 07 03:13:58 1997 GMT Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada Date: 1997-08-06T00:00:00+00:00 List-Id: In article <5sag85$9n2@portal.gmu.edu>, herwin@osf1.gmu.edu (HARRY R. ERWIN) wrote: > 'POSIX compliance' (read 'sorta like UNIX') is the operating system > version of the Ada mandate. Interestingly, Windows NT is 'POSIX > compliant' to ensure that it can be bid on Govt contracts that require it, > and (IMHO) is nearly useless when it is used that way. (Is my cynicism > showing?) :-) yes. Similar to why NASA (for SEWP) and the US Air Force contract with Hughs Data Systems say that OpenNT must be on the NT boxes for purchase. OpenNT replaces the MS POSIX subsystem with a Unix for NT. This means Unix code is really at home on an NT box. It'll likely take the cynicism away :-) > Cheers-- > Harry Erwin, Internet: herwin@gmu.edu, > Web Page: http://osf1.gmu.edu/~herwin > PhD student in computational neuroscience (how bats echolocate) ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ cool. - Rodney Ruddock -------------------==== Posted via Deja News ====----------------------- http://www.dejanews.com/ Search, Read, Post to Usenet